Rudisill et al v. Ford Motor Company
| Norman Rudisill and Karen Rudisill |
| Ford Motor Company and John Doe |
| 1:2008cv02409 |
| October 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Kathleen M. O'Malley |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Having considered the parties' arguments in their various filings, the Court concludes that there are no material factual disputes that would preclude summary judgment. Defendant Ford is entitled to summary j udgment on plaintiffs' claim of employer intentional tort. Since Mrs. Rudisill's lack of consortium claim is derivative of the intentional tort claim, that claim must also fail. Accordingly, Doc. No. 30 Defendant's Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Judge Sara Lioi on 03/30/2012. (H,KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
