Florida Power Corporation v. Firstenergy Corp.
| Florida Power Corporation |
| FirstEnergy Corp. |
| 1:2012cv01839 |
| July 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607 Real Property Tort to Land |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
Nunc Pro Tunc Opinion and Order The Court issues this Nunc Pro Tunc Opinion and Order and Judgment Entry in place of the Opinion and Order and Judgment Entry issued on 12/9/2016 (Doc ##: 119 , 120 ) due to grammatical errors occurring on page 5 of Doc #: 119 . The substance and rulings of the earlier Opinion and Order remain entirely the same. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 12/12/2016. (K,K)
|
|
Filing
119
Opinion and Order For the reasons stated in the Order, the Court DENIES Duke Energy's Motion (Doc #: [106) and GRANTS FirstEnergy's cross-motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability (Doc #: 114 ). Furthermore, the Court notes that even if the Court had granted Duke Energy's Motion on liability, the Court would also have granted First Energy's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment following the bankruptcy filing. (Doc #: 109 .) Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 12/9/2016. (K,K)
|
|
Filing
88
Opinion and Order granting First Energy's Motion for reconsideration, Doc # 84 and dismissing Progress Energy's claims. Judge Dan A. Polster (C,KA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
