Killer Joe Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-19

Plaintiff: Killer Joe Nevada, LLC
Defendant: Does 1-19
Case Number: 1:2013cv01039
Filed: May 7, 2013
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: James S. Gwin
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 9, 2013 5 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/9/12. The Court severs plaintiff's claims and denies as moot the motion for leave to take discovery prior to Rule 26 conference. Plaintiff shall, by 7/23/13, notify the Court which defendant shall remain in the suit already filed. (Related Doc. 4 ) (M,G)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Killer Joe Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-19
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Killer Joe Nevada, LLC
Represented By: Yousef M. Faroniya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-19
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.