Jones v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Roy Jones
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 1:2013cv02809
Filed: December 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Benita Y Pearson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2016 Filing 29 Judgment Entry The Court, having contemporaneously filed its Memorandum of Opinion and Order, hereby grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment entered in favor of Defendant. This case is closed. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/29/2016. (JLG)
March 29, 2016 Filing 28 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. #17 . Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/29/2016. (JLG)
February 4, 2016 Filing 27 Notice of Substitution of Counsel removing Attorney Kelly L. Wilson and adding Attorney Claire I Wade as counsel for Plaintiff filed by Roy Jones. (Wade, Claire) Modified text on 2/8/2016 (S,L).
October 6, 2015 Pursuant to General Order 2015-12 Judge Benita Y. Pearson randomly assigned to case. (K,K)
March 23, 2015 Filing 26 Reply in support of #17 Motion for summary judgment filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Volume 4, #2 Appendix Volume 5)(Linville, Ronald) Modified on 7/15/2015 (S,SR).
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for extension of time until March 23, 2015, to File Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment. (Related Doc. #25). Judge Lesley Wells on 2/27/2015.(C,LS)
February 25, 2015 Filing 25 Unopposed Motion for extension of to File Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment until March 23, 2015 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Hoyt, Matthew)
February 23, 2015 Filing 24 SEALED Document: Exhibit 3 to Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Roy Jones. (Related document(s) #14 , #19 ) (Spitz, Brian). Modified on 2/24/2015 to add link, counsel reminded to include cover page for future filings (H,SP).
February 23, 2015 Filing 23 SEALED Document: Exhibit 2 to Plaintiffs Brief in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Roy Jones. (Related document(s) #14 , #19 ) (Spitz, Brian). Modified on 2/24/2015 to add link, counsel reminded to include cover page for future filings (H,SP).
February 20, 2015 Filing 22 Deposition Transcript of Roy Jones filed by Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian)
February 20, 2015 Filing 21 Deposition Transcript of Richard Showman filed by Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian)
February 20, 2015 Filing 20 Deposition Transcript of Tyra Grier-Coleman filed by Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian)
February 20, 2015 Filing 19 Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement filed by Roy Jones. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit 1 Jones Affidavit, #2Exhibit 5 to Jones Deposition, #3 Exhibit 6 to Jones Deposition, #4Exhibit 7 to Jones Deposition, #5 Exhibit 9 to Jones Deposition, #6 Exhibit 10 to Jones Deposition, #7 Exhibit 14 to Jones Deposition, #8 Exhibit 2 to Showman Depo, #9 Exhibit 16 to Showman Depo, #10 Exhibit 17 to Showman Depo, #11 Exhibit 18 to Showman Depo, #12 Exhibit 19 to Showman Depo) (Spitz, Brian)
January 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time until February 20, 2015 to File Response/Reply. (Related Doc. #18). Judge Lesley Wells on 1/15/2015.(C,LS)
January 14, 2015 Filing 18 Motion for extension of time until February 20, 2015 to file response/reply to #17 Motion for summary judgment Motion for a 30 day Extension of the Deadline to File Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Roy Jones. Related document(s) #17 . (Wilson, Kelly)
December 22, 2014 Filing 17 Motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support Memorandum in Support, #2 Appendix Appendix Volume 1, #3 Appendix Appendix Volume 2, #4 Appendix Appendix Volume 3)(Linville, Ronald)
October 14, 2014 Filing 16 Amended Notice to take Deposition of Marc Liederbach and Tyra Grier-Coleman on November 17, 2014 filed by Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian)
September 8, 2014 Set Deadlines and Hearings( Discovery due by 11/20/2014., Dispositive Motions due by 12/20/2014. (C,LS)
September 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]Granting Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines. (Related Doc. #15). Discovery is extended until 11/20/2014 and dispositive motions are due by 12/20/2014. Judge Lesley Wells on 9/5/2014.(C,LS) Modified on 9/8/2014 (C,LS).
September 4, 2014 Filing 15 Motion for extension of Fact Discovery and Dispositive Motion until 11/20/2014 filed by Plaintiff Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian) Modified on 9/4/2014 to correct deadline date (C,BA).
August 6, 2014 Minutes of proceedings[non-document] Telephone Conference held on 8/6/2014. Participants included Kelly L. Wilson for the plaintiff; and Ronald G. Linville and Sima Cutler for the defendant. (Time: 15 Minutes). (M,JM)
July 21, 2014 Filing 14 Stipulated Protective Order. Judge Lesley Wells (C,KA)
July 15, 2014 Filing 13 Joint Motion for protective order filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Stipulated Protective Order)(Hoyt, Matthew)
May 19, 2014 Filing 12 Amended Notice to take Deposition of Richard Showman, Tyra Grier-Coleman and Marc Liederback on August 29, 2014 and September 3, 2014 filed by Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian)
May 19, 2014 Filing 11 Notice to take Deposition of Richard Showman, Tyra Grier-Coleman and Marc Liederback on August 29, 2014 and September 1, 2014 filed by Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian)
March 19, 2014 Filing 10 Case Management Conference Plan and scheduling notice. Case is assigned to the standard track.Fact Discovery due by 9/18/2014. Parties to be Joined and Pleading Amendments due by 3/31/2014, Dispositive Motions due by 10/18/2014, Telephonic status conference set for 8/6/2014 at 10:00 AM. Judge Lesley Wells (C,KA)
March 18, 2014 Minutes of proceedings[non-document] Case Management Conference held on 3/18/2014. Participants included attorneys Kelly Wilson for the plaintiff, and Ron Linville and Sima Cutler for the defendant. Plaintiff Roy Jones and Ford's corporate representative Tyra Grier-Coleman were in attendance. Case is assigned to the standard track. (M,JM)
March 4, 2014 Filing 9 Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting , parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linville, Ronald)
February 14, 2014 Filing 8 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order. A case management conference will be held on 3/18/2014 at 02:00 PM at Courtroom 328 before Judge Lesley Wells. (NOTE LOCATION: 328 Metzenbaum United States Court House, 201 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio). Judge Lesley Wells on 2/14/2014. (C,LS)
February 14, 2014 Filing 7 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order. A case management conference will be held on 3/18/2014 at 02:00 PM at Courtroom 328 before Judge Lesley Wells. NOTE LOCATION: 328 Howard Metzenbaum United States Court House, 201 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio. Judge Lesley Wells on 2/14/2014. (C,LS) (INCORRECT ATTACHMENT; ORDER REFILED SEE DOCUMENT #8)
February 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]Granting Plaintiff's Motion for conference. (Related Doc #6 . Conference will be set under separate order. Judge Lesley Wells on 2/14/2014.(C,LS)
February 13, 2014 Filing 6 Motion for conference/hearing filed by Plaintiff Roy Jones. (Spitz, Brian)
December 23, 2013 Filing 5 Answer to Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company. (Hoyt, Matthew)
December 23, 2013 Filing 4 Notice of Service of Notice of Filing Notice of Removal filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Linville, Ronald)
December 20, 2013 Filing 3 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (C,B)
December 20, 2013 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Ford Motor Company. (Hoyt, Matthew)
December 20, 2013 Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas, case number CV 13 817864 with jury demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0647-6332674. Filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hoyt, Matthew) Modified text on 12/20/2013 (C,B).
December 20, 2013 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge McHargh. (C,B)
December 20, 2013 Judge Lesley Wells assigned to case. (C,B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Ronald G. Linville
Represented By: Matthew W. Hoyt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Jones
Represented By: Kelly L. Wilson
Represented By: Brian D. Spitz
Represented By: Claire I. Wade-Kilts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?