Administrative Committee of the Dillard's Inc. Group Health, Dental, and Vision Plan v. Sarrough et al
| Administrative Committee of the Dillard's, Inc. Group Health, Dental and Vision Plan |
| May Sarrough and Law Offices of Bashein & Bashein Co. LPA |
| 1:2014cv01165 |
| May 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/21/15. The Court denies plaintiff's motion to stay and grants the motions for fees of Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., in the amount of $25,388.65 and the Law Offices of Bashein & Bashein Co., L.P.A., in the amount of $17,250.00. (Related Docs. 52 , 56 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
50
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/1/15 granting Defendants' 47 motion for summary judgment and denying Plaintiff's 45 motion for summary judgment. (S,HR)
|
|
Filing
35
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/18/15. The Court, as set forth in this Order, denies defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings without prejudice to refiling later. Plaintiff's motion to stay defendants' motion f or judgment on the pleadings and to convert same to a motion for summary judgment, along with the motions to strike part of the motion for judgment on the pleadings, are denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion for a pretrial conference, and to compel defendants' attendance at a Rule 26(f) discovery conference is denied. Plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint is granted and the amended complaint shall be filed for the limited purpose of adding another attorney as a named party possessing funds to which plaintiff asserts a claim. (Related Docs. 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 25 , 32 ) (M,G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Administrative Committee of the Dillard's Inc. Group Health, Dental, and Vision Plan v. Sarrough et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Administrative Committee of the Dillard's, Inc. Group Health, Dental and Vision Plan | |
| Represented By: | Syed Yousef Vaseem Hadi |
| Represented By: | John Kolb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: May Sarrough | |
| Represented By: | W. Craig Bashein |
| Represented By: | Paul W. Flowers |
| Represented By: | Robert G. Mansour |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Law Offices of Bashein & Bashein Co. LPA | |
| Represented By: | W. Craig Bashein |
| Represented By: | Paul W. Flowers |
| Represented By: | Robert G. Mansour |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
