Cummings v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority et al
| Noel Cummings |
| Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Michael York, Felicia Brooks-Williams, Bruce Hampton and Joseph Calabrese |
| 1:2014cv01729 |
| August 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 11/8/16 denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 65 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
64
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/28/16 denying plaintiff's motion to vacate the settlement agreement and reinstate her complaint for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 60 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
59
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/17/16 denying plaintiff's motion to review the settlement agreement for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 55 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
35
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/29/15. The Court grants the motion to dismiss Counts 5 and 10 as to all defendants; grants in part the motion to dismiss Counts 6 and 7; denies the motion to dismiss as to all other counts. (Related Doc. 11 ) (M,G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
