Perkins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Perkins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Perkins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Katera D. Perkins
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2014cv02213
Filed:	October 6, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Lorain
Presiding Judge:	Patricia A. Gaughan
Presiding Judge:	George J. Limbert
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 13, 2016	Filing 34 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court hereby awards attorney fees in the amount of $7,577.40 to plaintiff, which shall be sent to plaintiff's counsel provided no federal debts are owed. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/13/16. (LC,S) re 32
November 20, 2015	Filing 23 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court hereby REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation, which is incorporated herein by reference. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/20/15. (LC,S) re 21

Date Filed

Document Text

May 13, 2016

Filing 34 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court hereby awards attorney fees in the amount of $7,577.40 to plaintiff, which shall be sent to plaintiff's counsel provided no federal debts are owed. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/13/16. (LC,S) re 32

November 20, 2015

Filing 23 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, the Court hereby REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation, which is incorporated herein by reference. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/20/15. (LC,S) re 21

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katera D. Perkins
Represented By:	Kirk B. Roose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Social Security Administration - Chicago
Represented By:	Lisa Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?