Golenberke v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Golenberke v. Commissioner of Social Security

Golenberke v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Daniel Ray Golenberke
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2014cv02240
Filed:	October 8, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Geauga
Presiding Judge:	Dan Aaron Polster
Presiding Judge:	William H. Baughman
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2016	Filing 36 Memorandum Opinion and Order regarding plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. (Related doc. # 31 ). The Court finds that Golenberke is entitled to an award of attorney fees. Because the Commissioner did not specifically address the amou nts claimed by Golenberke in her response to the motion, the Commissioner is ordered to file a supplemental brief in this matter by 8/15/16, or meet and confer with Golenberke by that date, so as to deal with the particular fee amounts claimed. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 7/28/2016. (S,MD)
January 13, 2016	Filing 29 Memorandum Opinion and Order that the decision of the Commissioner denying Golenberke's application for disability insurance benefits be reversed and the matter remanded for further administrative proceedings. (Related docs # 1 , 10 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr on 1/13/16. (H,D)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2016

Filing 36 Memorandum Opinion and Order regarding plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. (Related doc. # 31 ). The Court finds that Golenberke is entitled to an award of attorney fees. Because the Commissioner did not specifically address the amou nts claimed by Golenberke in her response to the motion, the Commissioner is ordered to file a supplemental brief in this matter by 8/15/16, or meet and confer with Golenberke by that date, so as to deal with the particular fee amounts claimed. Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., on 7/28/2016. (S,MD)

January 13, 2016

Filing 29 Memorandum Opinion and Order that the decision of the Commissioner denying Golenberke's application for disability insurance benefits be reversed and the matter remanded for further administrative proceedings. (Related docs # 1 , 10 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr on 1/13/16. (H,D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Golenberke v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Ray Golenberke
Represented By:	Grant E. Felbaum
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Social Security Administration - Chicago
Represented By:	David A. Ruiz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?