Ehrlich v. Kovack et al
Plaintiff: Annette Ehrlich
Defendant: Michael Kovack, Joan Heller, Medina County, Ohio and Medina County, Ohio Commissioners
Case Number: 1:2014cv02560
Filed: November 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Medina
Presiding Judge: Greg White
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 113 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This matter is before the Court upon Defendants Medina County, Ohio and Medina County, Ohio Commissioners' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 93 ) and Defendants Michael Kovak and Joan Heller's Motio n for Summary Judgment (Doc. 94 ). Also pending is the Auditor Defendants' Motion to Strike Evidence (Doc. 107 ). This case arises out of plaintiff's termination from employment. For the reasons that follow, summary judgment is granted in favor of Kovack with respect to count two. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. The motion to strike is MOOT, with the exception of evidence regarding pornography, which the Court will consider. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/30/16. (LC,S) re 93 , 94 , 107
October 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 Memorandum Opinion & Order granting in part and denying in part defendants' 42 Motion for judgment on the pleadings . Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 10/1/2015. (S,S)
May 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Memorandum Opinion & Order denying Defendants Kovack and Heller's Motion to stay (Related Doc # 23 )for the reasons stated within. Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 5/5/2015.(R,Sh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ehrlich v. Kovack et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annette Ehrlich
Represented By: Theodore J. Lesiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Kovack
Represented By: Todd M. Raskin
Represented By: Cara M. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joan Heller
Represented By: Todd M. Raskin
Represented By: Cara M. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medina County, Ohio
Represented By: Kimberly Vanover Riley
Represented By: Brian M. Spiess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medina County, Ohio Commissioners
Represented By: Kimberly Vanover Riley
Represented By: Brian M. Spiess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?