O'Donnell et al v. City of Cleveland et al
| Erin O'Donnell, Wilfredo Diaz, Christopher Ereg, Michael Farley, Cynthia Moore, Michael Rinkus, William Salupo, Brian Sabolik and Scott Sistek |
| City of Cleveland, Michael McGrath, Martin Flask, Calvin Williams and Frank G Jackson |
| 1:2014cv02612 |
| November 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/8/15 granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment for the reasons as set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 53 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
66
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/1/15 granting plaintiffs' motion to compel, restricted to any potential emails from individuals who recommended or made the decision to assign plaintiffs to restricted duty. (Related Doc. 62 ) (W,M)
|
|
Filing
51
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/30/15 granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings of Defendant Frank G. Jackson. (Related Doc. 26 ) (M,G)
|
|
Filing
48
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/10/15 partially granting plaintiffs' motion to compel only as to the payroll records. (Related Doc. 46 ) (M,G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
