Linglong Americas, Inc. et al v. Horizon Tire, Inc.
| Linglong Americas, Inc., Shandong Linglong Tire Co. Ltd. and LLIT (Thailand) Co., Ltd. |
| Horizon Tire, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv01240 |
| June 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Medina |
| Donald C. Nugent |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
Memorandum Opinion and Order Plaintiffs' Motion should be granted in part and denied in part (#151) and that counter defendants' Motion should be granted in part and denied in part(#153). Counter Defendant John Hagan is dismissed. Counterclaims Nine, Ten, Eleven and Seventeen are dismissed. All other claims and counterclaims remain for trial set for April 22, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 3/15/19. (R,JM)
|
|
Filing
107
Memorandum Opinion and Order re 90 Granting GCR Tire & Service Motion For Assessment of Fees and Expenses. Horizon Tire, Inc. is ordered to reimburse GCR fees in the amount of $39,905.00. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 4/4/18. (R,JM)
|
|
Filing
52
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Linglong's Motion for protective order (Related Doc # 43 ); granting Horizon's Motion to compel deposition of Feng Wang (Related Doc # 46 ). The Parties shall inform the Court of the steps taken to comply with this Order at the Status Conference scheduled for May 13, 2016. Judge Donald C. Nugent 5/6/16(C,KA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
