Valdez v. Bunting

Valdez v. Bunting

Petitioner:	Henry Valdez
Respondent:	Jason Bunting
Case Number:	1:2016cv02074
Filed:	August 18, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Lorain
Presiding Judge:	James S. Gwin
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2017	Filing 7 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/20/17. Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment is denied for the reasons set forth in this order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). (Related Doc. 6 ) (D,MA)
September 27, 2016	Filing 4 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/27/16. The Court grants petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The Co urt further certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Section 2253; Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). (Related Docs. 1 and 2 ) (D,MA)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2017

Filing 7 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/20/17. Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment is denied for the reasons set forth in this order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). (Related Doc. 6 ) (D,MA)

September 27, 2016

Filing 4 Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/27/16. The Court grants petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The Co urt further certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Section 2253; Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). (Related Docs. 1 and 2 ) (D,MA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valdez v. Bunting
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Henry Valdez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bunting
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?