Williams v. Cavalry SPV I LLC et al
| Kelley Williams |
| Lloyd & McDaniel PLC, Cavalry SPV I LLC, Megan Urban, Michael J Linden, Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, James M Lloyd, Cavalry Investments, LLC and Gregory L. Crutcher |
| 1:2018cv01479 |
| June 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Christopher A Boyko |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Attorney Appearance by Boyd W. Gentry filed by on behalf of Cavalry Investments, LLC, Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Cavalry SPV I LLC. (Gentry, Boyd) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Action Under 28 U.S.C. 1441, 28 U.S.C. 1331 (Federal Question) from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV 18 898955 with jury demand, Filing fee paid $ 400, receipt number 0647-8782577. Filed by Cavalry Investments, LLC, Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Cavalry SPV I LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 State Court Complaint) (Elliott, Zachary) Modified on 6/29/2018 (S,SR). |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (S,SR) |
| Judge Christopher A. Boyko assigned to case. (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
