Jones v. Fender
Lee Jones |
Warden Douglas Fender |
1:2022cv01571 |
September 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
James E Grimes |
James R Knepp |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of 9/21/22 NEF reassigning Magistrate Judge mailed to Lee Jones at Lake Erie Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 8000, Conneaut, OH 44030. (S,HR) |
Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. pursuant to General Order 2022-17, with Automatic Reference of Administrative Action pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. (S,HR) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order. Respondent shall file an Answer (Return of Writ) to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order; Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of Respondent's Return of Writ to file a Reply (Traverse); Respondent shall have fifteen (15) days from the filing of Petitioner's Traverse to respond thereto. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/19/2022. (D,JJ) |
Filing 4 Order granting Petitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/19/2022. (D,JJ) |
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), and #5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order, mailed to Ohio Attorney General at 30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215, and to Douglas Fender, Warden Lake Erie Correctional Institution, 501 Thompson Road, Conneaut, OH 44030-8668 on 9/19/2022. Copy of #4 Order on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and #5 Magistrate Judge's Initial Order, mailed to Petitioner Lee Jones #A560-986 at Lake Erie Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 8000, Conneaut, OH 44030 on 9/19/2022. (D,JJ) |
Automatic Reference [non-document] of Administrative Action to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Judge James R. Knepp II on 9/19/2022. (B,JL) |
Filing 3 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. (L,MI) |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Lee Jones. (Attachments: #1 Cashier Statement). (L,MI) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Lee Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons). (L,MI) |
Judge James R. Knepp II assigned to case. (L,MI) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Fender | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Lee Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Douglas Fender | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.