Gary N. Brigman v. CSX Transportation Inc.

Defendant: CSX Transportation Inc.
Plaintiff: Gary M Brigman
Case Number: 3:2013cv00174
Filed: January 24, 2013
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Office: Toledo Office
County: Lucas
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Helmick
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 16, 2014 60 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion and Order: CSXT's motion for summary judgment is granted. Brigman's request to withdraw his motion for summary judgment is granted. re 37 36 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 10/16/2014. (S,AL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gary N. Brigman v. CSX Transportation Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary M Brigman
Represented By: Charles V. Contrada
Represented By: Patrick S. O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.