Mack v. Bunting

Mack v. Bunting

Petitioner:	Levio D. Mack
Respondent:	Jason Bunting
Case Number:	3:2014cv01628
Filed:	July 23, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Toledo Office
County:	Marion
Presiding Judge:	Benita Y. Pearson
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2015	Filing 6 Corrected Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Gover ning Section 2254 Cases. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/2/2015. (JLG)
February 27, 2015	Filing 3 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.2 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/27/2015. (JLG)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2015

Filing 6 Corrected Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Gover ning Section 2254 Cases. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/2/2015. (JLG)

February 27, 2015

Filing 3 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.2 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/27/2015. (JLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mack v. Bunting
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Levio D. Mack
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bunting
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?