Rodvold v. Lazaroff
Petitioner: Steven J Rodvold
Respondent: Alan Lazaroff
Case Number: 3:2014cv02007
Filed: September 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Toledo Office
County: Huron
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Presiding Judge: William H. Baughman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Opinion and Order For the reasons stated in the Order, the Court OVERRULES the Objections (Doc #: 20 ), ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety, (Doc #: 19 ), DISMISSES Grounds One and Three as procedurally defaulted and DENIES the claim asserted in Ground Two on the merits (Doc #: 1 ). Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 2/26/2016. (K,K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodvold v. Lazaroff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven J Rodvold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alan Lazaroff
Represented By: Jerri L. Fosnaught
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?