Design Basics, LLC v. Forrester Wehrle Homes, Inc. et al
| Design Basics, LLC |
| Forrester Wehrle Homes, Inc., Wehrle Decker Development Co., Ltd., Wehrle Development, Ltd. and Jeffrey John Wehrle |
| 3:2015cv00666 |
| April 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Lucas |
| James G. Carr |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
Order: Forrester Wehrle's motion to exclude the testimony and declarations of Carl Cuozzo (Doc. 153 ) is granted in part and denied in part as provided herein. Forrester Wehrle's motion to bar Design Basics from recovering damages in the form of profits Forrester Wehrle Homes generated through the sale of homes based on Design Basics' PGS works (Doc. 154 ) is denied. Forrester Wehrle's motion to exclude the spreadsheet evidence (Doc. 160 ) is granted w ithout prejudice as provided herein. Design Basics' omnibus motion (Doc. 158 ) is granted in part and denied in part as provided herein. Design Basics' motions to exclude evidence of its lost licensing revenue; the parties' curren t financial conditions; and the opinions and testimony of Brian Russell (Docs. 158 , 159 ) are referred to the Honorable Jack Zouhary for adjudication. In accordance with the order of April 22, 2019 (Doc. 172 ), this case is transferred to the docket of the Honorable Jack Zouhary for all further proceedings. Judge James G. Carr on 5/23/19.(C,D)
|
|
Filing
136
Order: The intervenors' complaints for declaratory judgment (Docs. 134 , 135 ) be, and the same hereby are, dismissed with prejudice. Judge James G. Carr on 5/24/18. (C,D)
|
|
Filing
130
Order: Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 81 ) be, and the same hereby is, denied. Judge James G. Carr on 3/27/18.(C,D)
|
|
Filing
114
Order: Plaintiff's motion to exclude defense expert Richard Kraly's original report for purposes of summary judgment (Doc. 89 , ID 3501-02) be, and the same hereby is granted as to the report's legal conclusions, but denied a s to the report's description of the similarities and differences between the parties' designs; Plaintiff's motion to exclude defense expert Richard Kraly's supplemental report for purposes of summary judgment (Doc. 89, ID 3502-03) be, and the same hereby is granted. Judge James G. Carr on 11/14/17. (C,D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
