Boyd et al v. Schwebel Baking Company
Plaintiff: Raymond Boyd and Terry L. Vukich
Defendant: Schwebel Baking Company
Case Number: 4:2015cv00871
Filed: May 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Youngstown Office
County: Mahoning
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 101 Memorandum Opinion and Final Order and Judgment: The Court approves the settlement as fair and reasonable and as having satisfied the standard for approval under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 216(b), and orders that the settl ement be implemented according to the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement and as directed herein. (Doc. No. 100 .) The Court dismisses the claim of the plaintiffs with prejudice, and enters final judgment dismissing it from the action. The Court finds no just reason for delay and directs the Clerk of Court to enter this final order and judgment immediately. The Court retains jurisdiction over the action to enforce the terms of the settlement, including addition of plaintiffs and the distribution process. (See Judgment for complete terms and details.) Judge Sara Lioi on 10/20/2017. (P,J)
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 62 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification (Doc. No. 38 ) is granted, as is plaintiff Boyd's motion to amend the complaint to substitute Bankruptcy Trustee Toby Rosen as a party plaintiff (Doc. No . 50 ). Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 47 ) is denied. The Court directs the parties to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating the language of the notice that is to be issued to the proposed co llective and the procedure for issuing the notice. If they are able to agree upon the form of the notice, within 10 days of this Memorandum Opinion, the parties shall submit a joint proposed notice for the Court's final approval. If they are una ble to agree, they shall so notify the Court and the Court shall resolve the conflict. The Court further directs that, within 30 days of the approval of the form of the notice by the Court, said notice shall be sent to all potential collective members. Finally, the parties should jointly contact the Court if, during this 30 period, they would like the Court to refer this matter to the magistrate judge for mediation. Judge Sara Lioi on 6/30/2016. (P,J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd et al v. Schwebel Baking Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schwebel Baking Company
Represented By: Frank W. Buck
Represented By: Lee J. Hutton
Represented By: Amy Ryder Wentz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Boyd
Represented By: Shannon M. Draher
Represented By: Hans A. Nilges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry L. Vukich
Represented By: Shannon M. Draher
Represented By: Hans A. Nilges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?