Henceroth et al v Chesapeake Exploration, LLC
Dale H. Henceroth, Melinda J. Henceroth, Ruth Burchfield, James M. Burchfield, Toni I. Burchfield, Marilyn S. Wendt, Janet K. Cooper, Wilford L. Copeland, Virgil Barnes and Karen G. Barnes |
Chesapeake Exploration, LLC |
4:2015cv02591 |
December 14, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Youngstown Office |
Columbiana |
Benita Y. Pearson |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 179 Memorandum of Opinion and Order Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Clarification of Answer at Hearing (ECF No. 177 ) is granted. Viewing all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, Defenda nt's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 146 ) is granted and Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 141 ) is denied. Final judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant and against the Class on the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 18 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/30/2019. (JLG) |
Filing 116 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 86 ), and denies Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of W.R. Harper, Jr.and Daniel T. Reineke (ECF No. 105 ). Additionally, Robert C. Sanders, Mark A. Hutson, James A. Lowe, and Robert L. Guehl are appointed lead class counsel. The Court finds that these attorneys will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, in consideration of the work counsel has done in investigating potential claims in this action, counsel's experience in handling class actions, other complex litigation, and claims of the type asserted in this action, counsel's knowledge of the applicable law, and the resources counsel will commit to representing the class. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/23/2018. (JLG) |
Filing 25 Memorandum of Opinion and Order Because Plaintiffs have pled sufficient facts pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) to state a claim that Chesapeake Exploration breached their leases, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECFNo. 9 ) is denied. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/29/2016. (JLG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.