Hicks v. Barberton Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Hicks
Defendant: Barberton Police Department, Vincent Morber, Martin Eberhart, Brian Davis, Stacy Colgan, K-9 Officer Art, John Does, City of Barberton Emergency Fire and Medical Service and City of Barberton
Case Number: 5:2011cv00076
Filed: January 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Summit
Presiding Judge: Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant's unopposed motion for summary judgment 22 is granted and this case is dismissed. (Amended to correct the date of arrest on page 2 from 1/6/2009 to 1/16/2009 in the opinion filed 3/8/2012, Doc. No. 28 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 11/15/2012. (P,J)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' unopposed motion for summary judgment is granted and this case is dismissed. (Related Doc # 22 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 3/8/2012. (P,J) (Main Document 28 replaced on 3/8/2012 to correct footnote, and NEF regenerated.) (P,G). Modified text on 3/8/2012 (P, S).
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's claims for conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983, and 1985, false arrest, sham legal process challenges to his conviction for resisting arrest, malicious prosecution, deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and discrimination are dismissed. The City of Barberton, the Barberton Police Department, Barberton Police Chief Vincent Morber, Barberton Police Officer Stacy Colgan, Canine "Officer Art", City of Barberton Emergen cy Fire and Medical Service, John/Jane Doe EMS responders, and John/Jane Doe Barberton Police Officers are dismissed as Defendants. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. This action shall proceed solely on Plaintiff's claims against Barberton Police Officers Martin Eberhart and Brian Davis for use of excessive force. (Related Doc # 1 , 7 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 7/22/2011. (P,J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Barberton Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barberton Police Department
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vincent Morber
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin Eberhart
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Davis
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacy Colgan
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K-9 Officer Art
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Barberton Emergency Fire and Medical Service
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Barberton
Represented By: Robert P. Lynch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?