Ford v. Alexander et al
| Jarritt R. Ford |
| Summit County Ohio, et al and Drew Alexander |
| 5:2011cv00575 |
| March 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting the Magistrate Judge's 69 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Federal claims are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against the unnamed John and Jane Doe Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. The Court declines to accept supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining State law claims, and dismisses these claims without prejudice. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/12/2013. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
60
Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons state above, the Court adopts the R&R's (ECF No. 51 ) finding that Defendant timely asserted the defense of exhaustion. Because the Court finds that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether administrative remedies were available to Plaintiff, the Court does not adopt the R&R's conclusion regarding the issue of the exhaustion requirement on the merits, and, as a result, does not adopt the recommendation that Defendants ' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted or that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Therefore, the motions for summary judgment are returned to the docket of the assigned magistrate judge to issue a revised Report and Recommendation on the merits of the issues presented in both parties' motions for summary judgment. Case reopened. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/4/2013. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
52
Memorandum of Opinion and Order The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 51 . Plaintiff's Federal claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Cour t declines to accept supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining State law claims, and dismisses these claims without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 11/27/2012. (S,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
