Premium Balloon Accessories, Inc. v. Creative Balloons Mfg., Inc.
| Premium Balloon Accessories, Inc. |
| Creative Balloons Mfg., Inc. |
| 5:2011cv00615 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
Memorandum Opinion and Order The Court grants PBA's motion for a joint status conference in the instant action as well as the companion case Premium Balloon Accessories v. Creative Balloon Mfg., Case No. 1:10-cv-979. The Court req uires the attendance of counsel and parties with full settlement authority. If lead counsel deems it necessary and prudent, a party may attend via telephone, during the entirety of the conference at no cost to the Court. If a matter does not settle, counsel and parties should be prepared to establish case management dates going forward in both matters. The status conference will take place 10/5/2012 at 2:00 pm. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/26/2012. (S,L)
|
|
Filing
10
Memorandum Opinion and Order Due to the amendment to 35 U.S.C. § 292 which eliminated the qui tam provision, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is moot. ECF No. 4 . Count I is stricken. This case will proceed as to Count II only. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/10/2012. (S,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
