Zino, Jr. et al v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
| Donald R. Hiner, Joseph Zino, Jr. and Roger N. Knop |
| Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation, Group Benefit Plan and Does |
| 5:2011cv01676 |
| August 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Stark |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
488
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 436 ) and to Strike the Declaration of Pamina Ewing, Accompanying Exhibits, and Portions of Plaintiffs' Corresponding Post Trial Briefing (ECF No. 441 ) are denied. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (ECF No. 451 ) is granted. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/27/2017. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
373
Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for reconsideration: Subclass B, like the others, is vested. (Related Doc # 362 ). Defendants' Motion for certification is denied (Related Doc # 364 . The matter is set for consolidated bench trial February 22, 2016. The matter is set for a telephonic final pretrial conference on January 15, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. Plaintiffs' counsel is to arrange the conference call. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/31/2015.(R,Sh)
|
|
Filing
360
Memorandum of Opinion and Order Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 332, is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Upon reconsideration, the Court maintains its rulings as to Subclasses A, C, and D for the reasons stated he rein. The Court reverses its bench trial ruling as to Subclass B. Specifically, the Court: (1) maintains its ruling in favor of Plaintiffs as to Subclass A, albeit for slightly different reasoning than articulated in its bench trial ruling; (2) ret urns to its initial finding and grants summary judgment to Defendants with respect to Subclass B; (3) maintains its ruling in favor of Plaintiffs, resulting from Phase One of the bench trial, as it applies to Subclass C; and (4) maintains its ruling in favor of Plaintiffs, resulting from Phase One of the bench trial, as it applies to Subclass D, in part, for different reasoning than articulated in its bench trial ruling. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/30/2015. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
310
Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order resolving phase one of trial (see document for details). Retirees motion for reconsideration and/or relief from entry of summary judgment as to Subclass B is granted [related document 261 ). Judge Benita Y. Pearson 9/19/2014. (R,Li)
|
|
Filing
191
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court issues the following orders with respect to Counts I and II of the Third Amended Complaint: (1) Retirees' and Whirlpool's motions for summary judgment are e ach denied as they pertain to the members of Subclass A; (2) Retirees' motion for summary judgment is denied, and Whirlpool's motion for summary judgment is granted, as they pertain to the members of Subclass B; and(3) Retirees' and Wh irlpool's motions for summary judgment are each denied as they pertain to the members of Subclass C and Subclass D. Furthermore, Count III of the Third Amended Complaint is moot, requiring no decision as to Whirlpool's corresponding motion for summary judgment. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/27/2013. Related document(s) 107 , 154 . (JLG)
|
|
Filing
110
Memorandum and Order denying Motion of the Interested party to Quash Subpoena 94 97 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 10/19/12. (R,N)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
