Potts v. American Bottling Company, Inc. et al
| Robert Potts |
| American Bottling Company, Inc. and Local No. 377 International Brotherhood of Teamsters |
| 5:2012cv02688 |
| October 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Trumbull |
| John R. Adams |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
Order and Decision granting Defendants' amended joint Motion for sanctions (Related Doc # 54 ). A hearing is scheduled for 8/31/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 575 to determine the nature of the sanction. Judge John R. Adams on 8/6/15.(K,C)
|
|
Filing
53
Order: The Court finds that ABC and the Union have not proven all requirements under Rule 11 have been satisfied. The Court hereby DENIES Defendants 47 Joint Motion for Sanctions. Judge John R. Adams on 01/21/2015.(M,TL)
|
|
Filing
43
Order and Decision granting Defendant Local No. 377's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 29 ); Defendant ABC's motion for summary jugdment [Doc. # 28 ) is granted in part and denied in part, ABC has 14 days to show cause as to why the counterclaim should not be dismissed; Defendants' joint motion for sanctions (Doc. # 30 ) is denied without prejudice. Judge John R. Adams on 3/31/14. (K,C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
