Holly Anderson v. Connie Sutton, et al
| Holly N. Anderson |
| Connie Sutton, Portage County Sheriff's Dept., David Doak and John Does 1-5 |
| 5:2014cv01272 |
| June 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Akron Office |
| Summit |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
Memorandum of Opinion and Order for the reasons set forth herein Portage County Defendants' Crossclaim against Defendant Sutton is moot and dismissedwithout prejudice. The Court declares that Portage County Defendants had a duty to defend Sutton in this action. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Count Two of Defendant Sutton's crossclaims. Count Two is dismissed without resolution and without prejudice. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/30/2016. (E,CK)
|
|
Filing
104
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court (1) grants in part and denies in part the County Defendants' Motion to Strike (ECF No. 88 ); (2) grants the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment o n Anderson's claims (ECF No. 81 ); and (3) denies the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Sutton's cross-claims (ECF No. 82 ). The matter shall proceed to trial. A separate Trial Order will issue. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 3/31/2016. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
