Austin v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Raymond Dean Austin
Respondent: Tim Buchanan
Case Number: 5:2015cv00333
Filed: February 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Akron Office
County: Summit
Presiding Judge: Dan Aaron Polster
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying petition and this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of theRules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3),that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis onwhich to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Dan A. Polster(C,KA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Austin v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Raymond Dean Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tim Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?