Profusion Industries, LLC v. Chem-Tek Systems, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Profusion Industries, LLC v. Chem-Tek Systems, Inc.

Profusion Industries, LLC v. Chem-Tek Systems, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Profusion Industries, LLC
Defendant:	Chem-Tek Systems, Inc.
Case Number:	5:2016cv00164
Filed:	January 22, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Akron Office
County:	Summit
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 9, 2016	Filing 10 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 9 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's motion is granted with respect to its first and third claim for relief pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Sect ion 1125(a) and Ohio Rev. Code Section 4165.01 et seq., respectively. Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging in unfair competition and deceptive trade practices, as outlined above. A permanent injunction order will be separate ly published. Costs are awarded to plaintiff pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1117(a) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1920. Plaintiff's motion is denied with respect to its second claim for relief pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(d). Plaintiff is granted leave until December 23, 2016 to show cause why plaintiff's second claim for relief should not be dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/9/2016. (P,J)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 9, 2016

Filing 10 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 9 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's motion is granted with respect to its first and third claim for relief pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Sect ion 1125(a) and Ohio Rev. Code Section 4165.01 et seq., respectively. Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging in unfair competition and deceptive trade practices, as outlined above. A permanent injunction order will be separate ly published. Costs are awarded to plaintiff pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1117(a) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1920. Plaintiff's motion is denied with respect to its second claim for relief pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(d). Plaintiff is granted leave until December 23, 2016 to show cause why plaintiff's second claim for relief should not be dismissed. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/9/2016. (P,J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Profusion Industries, LLC v. Chem-Tek Systems, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Profusion Industries, LLC
Represented By:	Heather M. Barnes
Represented By:	Christopher John Carney
Represented By:	Anastasia J. Wade
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Chem-Tek Systems, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?