Tate et al v. Statco Engineering, Inc. et al
||Edison C. Tate and Gayle J. Tate
||Statco Engineering, Inc. and Process Automation, Inc.
||January 3, 2012
||Oklahoma Eastern District Court
||Frank H. Seay
|Nature of Suit:
||Personal Injury- Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 25, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: denying 69 Statco's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 70 Process Automation Design, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 105 Process Automation Design, Inc.'s Motion in Limine (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
|February 7, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 131 Motion to Exclude Testimony; granting in part and denying in part 162 Motion to Strike or Exclude Evidence; granting 176 Motion in Limine; denying 178 Motion to Permit Jury to View Scene (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.