District Court Cases in Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02235
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alison v. Boatright et al
as 4:2026cv00520
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alison
Defendant:
Cory Boatright and Short Sale Fundamentals LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Luginbyhl v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2026cv02031
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liou v. Restore Masters Contracting, LLC
as 4:2026cv00518
Plaintiff:
Menqiong Liou
Defendant:
Restore Masters Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ornder v. St. John's Medical Center et al
as 4:2026cv00521
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ornder
Defendant:
St. John's Medical Center, Michael Kelly, Kody Ogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders et al v. Homesite Indemnity Company
as 5:2026cv02231
Plaintiff:
Michael Sanders and Tasha Sanders
Defendant:
Homesite Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02240
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02245
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv00300
Plaintiff:
Austin Lee Rowell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02232
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
