Murphy v. Workman
Petitioner: Patrick Murphy
Respondent: Randall Workman
Case Number: 6:2012cv00191
Filed: April 26, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: McIntosh
Presiding Judge: Kimberly E. West
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White : Denying 7 10 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254). The court hereby denies the certificate of appealability. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. Workman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Patrick Murphy
Represented By: Randy A. Bauman
Represented By: Patti Palmer Ghezzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randall Workman
Represented By: Jennifer L. Crabb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?