Sivec Srl v. Zeeco, Inc.

Debtor: Sivec Srl
Plaintiff: Sivec Srl
Defendant: Zeeco, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2012cv00405
Filed: September 28, 2012
Court: Oklahoma Eastern District Court
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Muskogee
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sivec Srl v. Zeeco, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: Sivec Srl
Represented By: Thomas E. Steichen
Represented By: S. Patrick McKey
Represented By: Joshua J. Heidelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sivec Srl
Represented By: Joshua J. Heidelman
Represented By: S. Patrick McKey
Represented By: Thomas E. Steichen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zeeco, Inc.
Represented By: John L. Randolph, Jr.
Represented By: Andrew R. Turner
Represented By: Robert J. Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.