Shade v. Shady Grove School

Defendant: Shady Grove School
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Shade
Case Number: 6:2013cv00013
Filed: January 7, 2013
Court: Oklahoma Eastern District Court
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Cherokee
Presiding Judge: Ronald A. White
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 23, 2013 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion for partial summary judgment ( 26 Motion for Summary Judgment ) (lal, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shade v. Shady Grove School
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shady Grove School
Represented By: Heather N. Hendricks
Represented By: Laura L. Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Shade
Represented By: Jerry S. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.