Halley v. Oklahoma State Department of Human Services et al
Frank Halley |
Oklahoma State Department of Human Services, Sara Huckaby, Ken Golden, Nathan Callaway, Colbert, City of and Jeff Goerke |
6:2014cv00562 |
December 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Muskogee Office |
Bryan |
James H. Payne |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 235 OPINION & ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne denying 101 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting in part and denying in part 103 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 104 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 105 Motion for Summary Judgment. (adw, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 214 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: (Re: 201 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order) (cjt, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 187 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: granting 92 Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce All Files Related to his Appointed Agent, Danny Williams; finding as moot 92 Motion for Protective Order; denying plaintiff's and defendants' requests for costs and fees (cjt, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 185 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: denying 138 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (cjt, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 133 OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: denying 54 Motion to Dismiss; denying 55 Motion to Dismiss; denying 60 Motion to Dismiss (cjt, Deputy Clerk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.