Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, The v. Public Service Company of Oklahoma
| 4:2005cv00053 |
| January 28, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Terence Kern |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; granting 38 Motion for Relief; granting 38 Motion for Judgment; denying 46 Motion to Vacate Order/Judgment (vah, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern, granting 47 Motion to Reconsider, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): (PSO is ordered to file a substantive response to BNSF's Motion to Vacate 46 by 3/12/2007 to which BNSF may reply by 3/26 /2007), vacating/setting aside order(s), Responses due by 3/12/2007, Replies due by 3/26/2007 (Re: 45 Judgment, Dismissing/Terminating Case, Entering Judgment, 44 Order, Ruling on Motion for Relief, Ruling on Motion for Judgment,, 46 MOTION to Vacate Order/Judgment) (JLW, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, The v. Public Service Company of Oklahoma | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
