Ennis v. Well Renewal, Inc. et al
| Jerry D Ennis |
| Well Renewal, Inc. (WRI-OKL) and Well Renewal, Inc. (WRI-DEL) |
| 4:2007cv00436 |
| August 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Real Property: Foreclosure Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul J Cleary |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 58 Motion for Writ of Execution; accepting 80 Report and Recommendation (Re: 34 Judgment,, Entering Judgment ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
80
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge T Lane Wilson (Re: 58 MOTION for Writ of Execution on Personal Property and Equipment Located on the Oil and Gas Lease Known as the Ross Lease ) (crp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
79
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge T Lane Wilson (Re: 51 MOTION for Writ of Execution on Personal Property and Equipment Located on the Oil and Gas Lease Known as the Ross/Payne (Payne/State) Lease ) (crp, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; granting 56 Motion for Writ of Execution; accepting 65 Report and Recommendation (Re: 34 Judgment,, Entering Judgment ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
65
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge T Lane Wilson (Re: 56 MOTION for Writ of Execution To Sell the Gulley Oil and Gas Lease ) (crp, Dpty Clk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
