Morris v. Sapulpa, City of et al
| Donna Morris |
| Sapulpa, City of, Jamie Noe, James Prine and Mike Heatherly |
| 4:2010cv00376 |
| June 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Creek |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan (AMENDED) - A copy of this Amended Order shall be designated by the parties for the record on appeal. (Re: 43 Opinion and Order,,,, Ruling on Motion to Reconsider, 39 Notice of Appeal to Circuit Court, ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment (Re: 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that Defendant Sapulpa Police Department [sic], Jamie Noe, James Prine, and Mike Heatherly's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 4) is granted in part and denied in part: it is g ranted as to the dismissal of defendants James Prine and Mike Heatherly; it is denied as to the remainder of the motion. ; terminating party Mike Heatherly and James Prine ; granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
