Crittenden et al v. Glanz et al
Plaintiff: Warren Crittenden, Mark Lechtenberg, Bill Mitchell and Michael Schmauss
Defendant: Stanley Glanz and Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County
Case Number: 4:2012cv00156
Filed: March 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Tulsa
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Presiding Judge: T Lane Wilson
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; remanding case (terminates case) ; granting 14 Motion to Remand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (Documents Terminated: 16 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support, 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims In Part, With Brief In Support, 29 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ) (RGG, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crittenden et al v. Glanz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren Crittenden
Represented By: Donald Eugene Smolen, II
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Represented By: Miranda Rachelle Russell
Represented By: Lauren Grace Lambright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Lechtenberg
Represented By: Miranda Rachelle Russell
Represented By: Lauren Grace Lambright
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Represented By: Donald Eugene Smolen, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bill Mitchell
Represented By: Lauren Grace Lambright
Represented By: Miranda Rachelle Russell
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Represented By: Donald Eugene Smolen, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Schmauss
Represented By: Lauren Grace Lambright
Represented By: Miranda Rachelle Russell
Represented By: Daniel E Smolen
Represented By: Donald Eugene Smolen, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley Glanz
Represented By: John Alfred Burkhardt, Jr
Represented By: Reuben Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County
Represented By: Douglas Allen Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?