Robinson v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
James Robinson |
Dolgencorp, LLC |
4:2013cv00001 |
January 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Tulsa Office |
Rogers |
Claire V Eagan |
Frank H McCarthy |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; denying 15 Motion to Remand (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint, 2 Notice of Removal ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Robinson v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dolgencorp, LLC | |
Represented By: | Yvette Braaks Hart |
Represented By: | Joel Steven Allen |
Represented By: | Kristen Laster |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Robinson | |
Represented By: | Brendan Michael McHugh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.