T.D. Williamson, Inc. v. Associates Engineers, India et al
| T.D. Williamson, Inc. |
| Associate Engineers, India, AIT Consulting Group, Inc., Associate Engineers (India) Private Limited, Associate Engineers (Vadodara) Private Limited, Sumantlal Ramanial Shah, Paresh Sumantlal Shah, Hiteshkumar Sumantlal Shah and Jakesh "Jay" Shah |
| 4:2013cv00223 |
| April 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Tulsa |
| Paul J Cleary |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that this case is stayed pending completion of the arbitration proceedings. The parties shall file a joint statement advising the Court of the arbitrator's decision within 15 days of the completio n of the arbitration proceedings. Pursuant to LCvR 41.1, the Court Clerk is directed to administratively close this case pending either an order of the Court reopening the action, or until this case is dismissed with prejudice by stipulation of the parties. ; staying case; administratively closing the case (terminates case) ; granting 42 Motion to Compel Arbitration; denying 45 Motion to Amend (Re: 12 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
