Davis v. Central Oklahoma Community Action Agency Inc
Plaintiff: Latosha R Davis
Defendant: Central Oklahoma Community Action Agency Inc
Case Number: 5:2008cv00890
Filed: August 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Pottawatomie
Presiding Judge: Tim Leonard
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, as more fully set forth. Signed by Honorable Tim Leonard on 01/05/10. (jy, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Central Oklahoma Community Action Agency Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latosha R Davis
Represented By: Stanley M Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Oklahoma Community Action Agency Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?