2200 Classen LLC v. York Operating Company

Defendant: York Operating Company
Plaintiff: 2200 Classen LLC
Case Number: 5:2011cv00774
Filed: July 12, 2011
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Timothy D. DeGiusti
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 18, 2011 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Defendant shall file an amended removal to allege the existence of diversity jurisdiction no later than 7/28/2011 re 1 Notice of Removal,, filed by York Operating Company. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 7/18/2011. (mb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 2200 Classen LLC v. York Operating Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: York Operating Company
Represented By: Robert H Alexander, Jr
Represented By: Robert W Ivy
Represented By: John J Love
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 2200 Classen LLC
Represented By: Clell I Cunningham, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.