Cantu Services Inc v. Worley et al
| Cantu Services Inc |
| James Kevan Worley and Blackstone Consulting Inc |
| 5:2012cv00129 |
| February 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David L. Russell |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER re 97 MOTION for Protective Order to Temporarily Preclude Service of Subpoena filed by Blackstone Consulting Inc, 99 MOTION to Compel Combined Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and to Overrule Defendant's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Subpoena filed by Cantu Services Inc. After conducting its review, the Court concludes that the produced materials did not reveal any evidence of crime or fraud. Accordingly, the crime-fraud exception is inapplicable. Therefore, Cantus motion to compel, Doc. No. 99, is DENIED. Further, BCIs motion for a protective order, Doc. No. 97, is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 7/12/21. (jw)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER denying in part 97 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 99 Motion to Compel, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 6/7/21. (jw)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting 80 Motion for Reconsideration ; finding as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 14 Motion to Stay Case, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 10/19/20. (jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
