Shrum v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Plaintiff: Helen E. Shrum
Case Number: 5:2012cv01057
Filed: September 24, 2012
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Robin J. Cauthron
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shrum v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Represented By: Donald W Fowler
Represented By: Jesse J. Graham, II
Represented By: Joe Gregory Hollingsworth
Represented By: Robert Johnston
Represented By: Robert E Johnston
Represented By: Katharine R Latimer
Represented By: Diane E. Lifton
Represented By: David E. Richman
Represented By: Vani R Singhal
Represented By: Yanika C. Smith-Bartley
Represented By: Thomas E Steichen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helen E. Shrum
Represented By: Daniel Adam Osborn
Represented By: Philip Jeremy Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.