Lopez Foods Inc v. Aegis Sciences Corporation

Plaintiff: Lopez Foods Inc
Defendant: Aegis Sciences Corporation
Case Number: 5:2013cv00065
Filed: January 22, 2013
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Robin J. Cauthron
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 7, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER stricken as moot 5 Amended Motion to Quash Subpoena for the Deposition of Lopez Foods, Inc.; terminating 1 Motion to Quash; case dismissed. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 3/7/13. (lg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez Foods Inc v. Aegis Sciences Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lopez Foods Inc
Represented By: Greg A Castro
Represented By: Michael T Griggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aegis Sciences Corporation
Represented By: Jason S Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.