Leverette v. Archer Pressure Pumping LLC

Plaintiff: Andre Leverette
Defendant: Archer Pressure Pumping LLC
Case Number: 5:2013cv00163
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Comanche
Presiding Judge: Robin J. Cauthron
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 2, 2014 68 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 43 Defendant Archer Pressure Pumping LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 4/2/14. (lg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leverette v. Archer Pressure Pumping LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre Leverette
Represented By: Mark E Hammons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Archer Pressure Pumping LLC
Represented By: Courtney K Warmington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.