Ellis v. Dowling et al

Respondent: Janet Dowling
Petitioner: Bobby M Ellis
Case Number: 5:2013cv00471
Filed: May 8, 2013
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Alfalfa
Referring Judge: Gary M. Purcell
Presiding Judge: Lee R. West
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 17, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Janet Dowling, 12 Report and Recommendation; the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation; GRANTS the respondent's Mtn Dism; DISMISSES this matter w/o prej. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 7/17/13. (ap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellis v. Dowling et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Represented By: Diane L Slayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bobby M Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.