Swisher v. Stryker Corporation et al
Kyle M Swisher |
Stryker Corporation, Corin Group PLC and Corin USA Limited Inc |
5:2014cv00028 |
January 9, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Oklahoma |
Joe Heaton |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 172 ORDER granting 111 defendants' motion for summary judgment...summary judgment in defendants' favor will be granted on both plaintiff's claims; plaintiff's motion to dismiss his second claim with prejudice 120 is denied; as the court finds it unnecessary to determine whether the affidavit of Dr. Ellis should be stricken to resolve defendants' summary judgment motion, defendants' motion to strike that affidavit 124 is denied as being moot...see order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 02/03/2016. (lam) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting 7 defendants' motion to dismiss and plaintiff's negligence per se claim is dismissed...as it is possible plaintiff may be able to correct the pleading deficiencies he is granted leave to file an amended complaint by 04/04/2 014...otherwise this action will be dismissed; defendant Corin USA Limited noted in its motion that is was incorrectly sued as Corin USA Limited, Inc., the clerk is directed to correct the caption on the docket sheet to reflect the defendant's correct name. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 03/14/2014. (lam) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.