Berryhill v. United States Department of Justice et al
| Lavern Berryhill |
| Sanford Coats, United States District Judges Western District of Oklahoma, Vicki Miles-LaGrange, Scott Pruitt, Mary Fallin, Oklahoma State of, United States Department of Justice, Kerry Ann Kelly, Kay Sewell, Rozia McKinney-Foster and Linda Epperley |
| 5:2014cv00287 |
| March 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Pittsburg |
| Lee R. West |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 6 Report and Recommendation; deems moot all pending motions; pursuant to section 1915A(b)(1), DISMISSES this action as frivolous; and FINDS for the reasons articulated by the Honorable Robin J. Cauthro n, United States District Judge for the Western District of Oklahoma, who also has been confronted with Berryhill's "offensive and/or abusive documents," Berryhill v. United States ofAmerica, No. CIV-225-C, slip op. at 1 (W.D. Okla. Ma y 22, 2012), that because this case has been dismissed, any future papers (including any papers seeking reconsideration), other than those documents necessary to perfect an appeal, that are submitted by Berryhill in this case will not be filed by the Clerk of the Court, but will instead be returned by the Clerk to Berryhill. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 4/28/14. (kw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
