McNeese Photography LLC et al v. Access Midstream Partners LO et al
Plaintiff: McNeese Photography LLC and David McNeese
Defendant: Access Midstream Partners LP and Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Case Number: 5:2014cv00503
Filed: May 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER granting 160 Third Motion to Compel. The Court directs the parties to complete the agreed upon procedure within 60 days. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 9/11/2017. (mb)
March 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 145 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 71 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 3/10/2017. (mb)
May 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER denying 70 Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiff From Offering Expert Testimony. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 5/20/2016. (mb)
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER denying 106 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 4/4/2016. (mb)
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 defendant Access Midstream Parnters' motion to dismiss as to the claims of McNeese Photography's for copyright infringement and "aiding and abetting" as well as Mr. McNeese's cl aims for statutory damages stemming from the infringement of "012214_48 photos."...the motion is otherwise denied...it is not apparent that the grounds for dismissal of McNeese Photography's claims can be remedied by amendment but, if they can be plaintiffs shall file any amended complaint within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 08/11/2014. (lam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNeese Photography LLC et al v. Access Midstream Partners LO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: McNeese Photography LLC
Represented By: Randall K Calvert
Represented By: Denielle Williams Chaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David McNeese
Represented By: Randall K Calvert
Represented By: Denielle Williams Chaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Access Midstream Partners LP
Represented By: Julianna G Deligans
Represented By: Anthony J Jorgenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Represented By: Michael J LaBrie
Represented By: Zachary A P Oubre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?